Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between suspended scattering particles in motion (SSPiM) in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and treatment response in diabetic macular edema (DME). We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with DME who had undergone intravitreal injection. The optical density ratio (ODR) of the intraretinal cyst and the numbers of hyperreflective foci from OCT images and SSPiM from OCTA images were compared, and their association with treatment response was analyzed. Forty-five eyes from 45 patients were included in this study. Twenty-four patients were treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, and 21 patients were treated with a steroid. Binary logistic regression model showed that SSPiM in OCTA images was associated with hyperreflective foci numbers (P = 0.038) and mean ODR of the intraretinal cyst (P = 0.006). Linear regression model showed that SSPiM in the inner nuclear layer was related to treatment response (P = 0.006). SSPiM on OCTA images is related to the poor structural response to treatment in DME.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) is a recently developed imaging technique that can visualize blood vessels with depth resolution1. The characteristics of OCTA imaging in various diseases have been described2,3,4,5,6,7. OCTA images are obtained using differences in reflectivity from repeated optical coherence tomography (OCT) B scan images8,9. Since red blood cells have high reflectivity in OCT images, OCTA images can show the blood vessels.
Because OCTA does not use dye, it is comparatively simple and does not selectively mark blood vessels, unlike other angiography techniques. Therefore, there is the possibility of various artifacts in OCTA images, as have been reported in previous studies10,11,12,13. However, nonvascular decorrelation signals observed on OCTA are not always artifacts. Kashani et al. recently reported a novel artifact-like feature called suspended scattering particles in motion (SSPiM)14. Supplementary Figure shows examples of SSPiM. This likely represents actual flow of suspended particles in intraretinal fluid, not an artifact. The authors suggested that more severe blood-retinal barrier (BRB) breakdown resulted in greater particle outflow, leading to SSPiM. We suspect that a difference in BRB breakdown will affect treatment response and be of clinical relevance.
In diabetic patients, the inner BRB is destroyed by disruption of elements maintaining the inner BRB, including occludin of the retinal vascular endothelium, Muller cells, and astrocytes15. Breakdown of the inner BRB increases serum exudation from the retinal vessel. Diabetic macular edema (DME) caused by increased exudation is a typical cause of SSPiM. The purpose of the current study is to investigate the relationship between SSPiM and treatment response in DME.
Results
Differences According to the Presence or Absence of SSPiM in OCTA Images
Table 1 shows the characteristics of the patients according to the presence or absence of SSPiM in OCTA images. There were no differences in underlying disease, HbA1c, treatment agent, cyst location, cyst size, or the standard deviation of optical density ratio (ODR) between the two groups. However, the mean ODR was greater (5.41 ± 3.26, 2.30 ± 1.46, P < 0.001) in the group with SSPiM. The number of hyperreflective foci (HRF) was greater in the group with SSPiM (4.57 ± 3.59, 1.50 ± 3.21, P = 0.003). In the group with SSPiM, the size of the intraretinal cyst decreased less after treatment (30.06 ± 54.05%, 69.00 ± 45.46%, P = 0.030).
Treatment response of intraretinal cysts
Table 2 shows the treatment response of intraretinal cysts observed on OCT image. The proportion of complete response was lower in cysts with SSPiM (0.33 ± 0.39, 0.68 ± 0.35, P = 0.017). The proportion of partial response did not vary with or without SSPiM (0.33 ± 0.39, 0.20 ± 0.26, P = 0.815). The proportion of no response was higher in cysts with SSPiM (0.33 ± 0.45, 0.11 ± 0.25, P = 0.038).
Factors related to SSPiM
Table 3 shows the results of univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression analysis of factors related to SSPiM. Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis of factors related to the SSPiM showed that the number of HRF (OR = 1.457, CI = 1.066–1.992, P = 0.038) and the mean ODR of the intraretinal cyst (OR = 2.287, CI = 1.150–4.547, P = 0.006) were significant variables.
Factors related to treatment response
Among the 45 patients with DME, 24 patients were injected with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and 21 patients were injected with a steroid. Table 4 shows results of univariable linear regression analysis of factors related to treatment response. Linear regression analysis revealed that treatment response was related to only SSPiM in the inner nuclear layer (INL) (β = −0.457, P = 0.006).
The analysis of patients treated with anti-VEGF showed that treatment response was related to SSPiM observed in the INL (β = −0.477, P = 0.039). The analysis of patients treated with a steroid showed that treatment response was related to SSPiM observed in the ONL (β = −0.773, P = 0.005).
Factors related to visual acuity and central macular thickness
Table 5 shows the results of univariable linear regression analysis of factors related to visual acuity and central macular thickness. OCT and OCTA image factors were not related to visual acuity in this study. Central Macular Thickness(CMT) was related to sex (β = −0.326, P = 0.029), cyst size (β = 0.552, P < 0.001), mean ODR in cyst (β = −0.299, P = 0.046), and the SD of the ODR in the cyst (β = −0.311, P = 0.037). The reduction in CMT was related to cyst size (β = 0.307, P = 0.040), mean ODR in cyst (β = −0.296, P = 0.048), SSPiM in INL (β = −0.440, P = 0.008), and SSPiM in outer nuclear layer (ONL) (β = −0.357, P = 0.021).
Case 1
A 50-year-old woman visited the hospital for diabetic retinopathy screening. She had been treated for diabetes and hypertension over the prior 3 years. On examination, she was diagnosed with very severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy in the right eye and proliferative diabetic retinopathy in the left eye. She underwent panretinal photocoagulation in both eyes. One year later, she complained of decreased vision in both eyes. She was diagnosed with DME in both eyes, and treated with focal laser therapy. DME disappeared, but recurred in the left eye seven months later. On OCT and OCTA, there was an intraretinal cyst with SSPiM and HRF (Fig. 1). After 4 weeks of intravitreal triamcinolone injection, the size of the largest cyst remained unchanged. Another cyst without SSPiM also remained unchanged. However, three smaller cysts without SSPiM disappeared.
Case 2
A 49-year-old man presented with decreased vision in the left eye. He had been treated for diabetes and hypercholesterolemia for 9 years. He also underwent panretinal photocoagulation in the nasal area at another hospital 4 years ago. On examination, he was diagnosed with very severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy in both eyes and DME in the left eye (Fig. 2). On OCT and OCTA, there were several intraretinal cysts without SSPiM. After 4 weeks of intravitreal ranibizumab injection, the intraretinal cysts disappeared.
Case 3
A 55-year-old woman presented with decreased vision in the left eye. She had been treated for the prior 19 years for diabetes and hypertension. On examination, she was diagnosed with high risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy in both eyes and DME in the left eye. She underwent panretinal photocoagulation in both eyes and received two monthly intravitreal injections of bevacizumab in the left eye. There was no response to bevacizumab injection, but DME was improved after focal laser treatment. One year later, DME recurred (Fig. 3). On OCT and OCTA, there were one intraretinal cyst with SSPiM and several small intraretinal cysts without SSPiM. After 4 weeks of intravitreal triamcinolone injection, the SSPiM-free intraretinal cysts disappeared, while the SSPiM-positive intraretinal cysts persisted.
Discussion
In this study, we imaged DME using OCT and OCTA. We assessed the intraretinal cystic cavity in OCT images and evaluated the relationship between OCT findings and SSPiM in the intraretinal cysts in OCTA images. The greater the ODR of the intraretinal cyst and the greater the number of HRF, the greater the probability of observing SSPiM. The results of this study are very similar to a previous study14. The BRB prevents the migration of large molecules, such as serum proteins, under normal conditions. Increased VEGF under ischemic conditions, like DME, weakens BRB function16. This allows serum proteins to permeate the retinal interstitium. Previous studies have shown that proteins, such as albumin or serum reactants, in the intraretinal cyst are hyperreflective in OCT images17. Because OCTA does not selectively highlight blood vessels, unlike other angiography techniques, a material moving at a rate similar to blood flow can be observed in OCTA.
OCTA is known to detect flows between 0.3 and 4 mm per second. It has been previously reported that OCTA does not enable detection of retinal capillary flow of less than 0.3 mm per second or turbulent blood flow inside microaneursms18,19. However, this study suggests that other factors besides the flow velocity may influence OCTA images. Univariable binary logistic regression revealed that the standard deviation of the intraretinal cyst ODR was related to SSPiM in OCTA images. The presence of hyperreflective materials, such as HRF, increases the standard deviation of ODR. A particle with high reflectivity can cause OCTA image artifacts, like a false positive decorrelation in a patient with pigment epithelial detachment10. Another study has reported that a large lumen, like the intraretinal cysts in this study, induced multiple dynamic backscattering and showed a OCTA signal differing from the capillary20. We hypothesize that a flow faster than 0.3 mm per second or hyperreflective materials in the intraretinal cyst can be observed in OCTA as SSPiM.
The number of HRF was correlated with the SSPiM in OCTA. HRF in the intraretinal cyst are also found in severe BRB disruption21. Therefore, HRF and SSPiM may be related because both appear to occur when the BRB breaks down. Meanwhile, another study using OCTA had reported that HRF, especially in the Henle’s fiber layer, had a decorrelation signal in OCTA images22. With HRF, SSPiM is more likely to be observed in OCTA images, but this cannot be regarded as reflecting the entire SSPiM in the intraretinal cyst.
In this study, we analyzed the relationship between the SSPiM in OCTA images and treatment response as a structural outcome. The presence of SSPiM in OCTA images was associated with poor treatment response. ODR and HRF, as related to SSPiM in this study, were related to treatment response in previous OCT-based studies. The intraretinal fluid turbidity in OCT images, corresponding to the ODR in this study, could influence the treatment response23. The absence of HRF was associated with good treatment response24. When SSPiM was divided into layers, SSPiM observed in the INL was most greatly related to treatment response; whereas, SSPiM observed in the ONL was not related to treatment response. On the other hand, in cases when the cyst exists in the ONL, the developmental mechanism may differ from the mechanism in the inner layer. Bringmann et al. reported that retinal edema in outer retina may not be accompanied by vascular leakage and may be explained by a disturbance in dehydrating function25. Therefore, SSPiM in the ONL may not be related to fluid efflux from retinal vessels, and therefore may be considered independent of treatment response.
We divided the groups according to treatment modality and analyzed factors predicting treatment response. Similar to the results for the entire patient population, SSPiM in the INL of the OCTA images was associated with poor treatment response in the anti-VEGF group. However, treatment response was not associated with SSPiM in the INL, but was associated SSPiM in the ONL in the steroid group. Steroids have a stronger effect than anti-VEGF agents, acting on the non-VEGF pathway as well as on the VEGF pathway that causes DME26. There is a tendency to administer steroids in patients who are predicted to have poor treatment response in a clinical setting. This study had a small number of patients and retrospective study design, and thus could not determine whether steroid or anti-VEGF treatment is more effective for patients with SSPiM on OCTA because of bias. However, we did show that both steroid and anti-VEGF treatments were less effective in patients with SSPiM on OCTA. A prospective study with a randomized and controlled design is needed to clarify the differences between treatment regimens.
In general, CMT is used as an indicator of anatomical changes related to DME treatment, while visual acuity is used as an indicator of functional changes. In this study, SSPiM was related to treatment response and change in CMT. However, cyst size and mean ODR of the cyst were related only to changes in CMT. In previous studies, intraretinal cysts have been reported as negative predictors of functional improvement27,28. Therefore, SSPiM is expected to be related to visual acuity or visual improvement after treatment. However, the parameters of OCT and OCTA images were not related to visual acuity in this study. We did not evaluate the cyst in the foveal center. The largest intraretinal cyst analyzed in this study was often located in the foveal center, and the change in CMT showed similar results to treatment response. It was not necessarily located at the foveal center, so there was no exact match. The results of this study alone cannot clarify the relationship between SSPiM and visual acuity or between SSPiM and change in CMT.
This study has several limitations. First, it utilized a retrospective design with a relatively small number of cases. Statistical significance should be interpreted with caution, especially in the multivariable regression model. Second, segmentation error was not corrected. The presence of an intraretinal cyst increases the probability of an automated segmentation error. This can cause errors in the intraretinal cyst position, but it has the advantage of eliminating bias due to manual measurements and of quick judgements. Rapid assessment based on automatically segmented images in the clinical environment is useful. Third, the processing algorithm differs from machine to machine in OCTA. The OCTA in this study used a full-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation method. Although full-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation has an advantage of good axial resolution, it has the disadvantage of noise in comparison to split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation29,30,31. It is possible that studies using other OCTA machines may obtain different results. Finally, we analyzed only the largest cysts in each subject, since there may be differences in the presence or absence of SSPiM in each cyst. The results of this study thus can only reflect the treatment response of individual cysts, and not of the patient. Since the largest cyst is not always located in the macular center, treatment response in this study may vary from treatment response with regard to DME or visual acuity.
In conclusion, SSPiM on OCTA images is related to a poor structural response to treatment. Thus, we believe that our findings could provide some information on the characteristics and treatment response of intraretinal cysts. Lastly, these results suggest the possibility of using SSPiM as a biomarker for DME.
Methods
Ethics statement
The Institutional Review Board of Korea University approved this retrospective case series study, waiving the requirement for informed consent for study participation. All research and data collection were conducted in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki by the World Medical Association.
Patients
We reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients who were diagnosed with DME and who had undergone intravitreal injection between March 2017 and February 2018 at the Korea University Medical Center. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) other ocular diseases, such as retinal vein occlusion; (2) a history of intraocular treatment within 6 months (e.g. intravitreal injection, laser photocoagulation, or cataract surgery); (3) a history of vitrectomy; (4) OCTA images with artifacts not related to the intraretinal cyst, such as blinking artifacts, or motion artifacts; and (5) OCTA images with poor quality (signal strength index of less than 30).
Patients were treated with a steroid or anti-VEGF, and treatment modalities were chosen by one retinal specialist. Patients with pseudophakia or difficulty visiting the hospital were treated with a steroid, and those with a history of previous elevation of intraocular pressure were treated with anti-VEGF. Treatment response was evaluated 4 weeks after intravitreal injection. For patients who underwent multiple intravitreal injections, the images taken at the first intravitreal injection during the study period were analyzed.
Image acquisition
The OCTA instrument (Heidelberg Spectralis OCT2, Family acquisition module 6.4.21.0; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) used in this study had a central wavelength of 870 nm, speed of 85,000 A-scans/second, horizontal resolution of 5.7 μm, and an axial resolution of 3.9 μm. An OCTA scan pattern was 10 × 10 degrees (3 × 3 mm; consisting of 512 B scans) centered on the macula. The OCTA acquisition software utilized a full-spectrum and probabilistic algorithm. En face OCTA images were exported from image viewer software (Heidelberg Eye Explorer, software version 1.21; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) after application of projection artifact removal in the deeper layers.
Location and size of intraretinal cyst and treatment response
The largest intraretinal cyst observed within a 3 × 3 mm area centered on the macula was used for analysis. CMT was automatically measured on an en face macular map. OCT images were analyzed using B scan images through the longest horizontal diameter of the intraretinal cyst. The actual location of the intraretinal cyst, not the automatically detected location, was determined by agreement of two researchers (JA and SH). In cases of disagreement, a final determination was made after review by a third observer (SWK).
The size of intraretinal cyst was measured from OCT images using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health; http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/) with a freehand selection tool. This measurement was performed before and 4 weeks after treatment. Treatment response was determined by comparing OCT images before and after treatment and defined as follows: \(\frac{{\rm{cyst}}\,{\rm{size}}\,{\rm{before}}\,{\rm{treatment}}-{\rm{cyst}}\,{\rm{size}}\,{\rm{after}}\,{\rm{treatment}}}{{\rm{cyst}}\,{\rm{size}}\,{\rm{before}}\,{\rm{treatment}}}\). Two observers (JA and SH) were masked to patient information and independently measured the area of the intraretinal cyst. Interobserver agreement for the area of the intraretinal cyst was satisfactory (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.956).
Treatment response of intraretinal cysts
Treatment response of intraretinal cysts including the largest cyst was determined by comparing OCT images before and after treatment: (1) complete response, complete loss of intraretinal cysts; (2) partial response, reduced intraretinal cyst size; (3) no response, unchanged or increased intraretinal cyst size. The presence of SSPiM in each cyst was confirmed using OCTA image. The proportion of treatment response was calculated by comparing the number of intraretinal cysts before and after treatment.
Optical density ratio of intraretinal cyst
The ODR of intraretinal cyst were calculated using ImageJ software. The ODR was measured according to a method used in a previous study with minor modification32. In brief, the total intraretinal cyst and vitreous humor were selected. The gray-level intensity of the selected region was measured and ODR was calculated by dividing the gray-level intensity of the intraretinal cyst by the gray-level intensity of the vitreous humor. Two observers (JA and SH) were masked to patient information and independently analyzed ODR. Interobserver agreement for ODR was satisfactory (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.994).
Hyperreflective foci and suspended scattering particles in motion
The number of HRF in the OCT images was counted. HRF present in the cyst and in the margins of the cyst were included in the analysis. The presence of SSPiM was confirmed using en face OCTA images. The presence of HRF in OCT images and SSPiM in OCTA images were determined by agreement of two observers (JA and SH). In cases of disagreement, a final determination was made after review by a third observer (SWK).
Statistical analysis
Continuous variables were represented as the mean ± standard deviation and categorical variables were expressed as the count (%). Normal distribution of variables was determined using a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. General characteristics and parameters were compared with Pearson’s chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U test or Independent t-test for continuous variables. P values from multiple comparisons of a single OCT image were adjusted using Bonferroni’s method.
Linear regression or binary logistic regression analyses were performed to analyze the relationship among the variables. Backward variable elimination method was used to select some important variables in the multivariable regression models including only covariates with a P < 0.05 in the univariable logistic regression models. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS software version 25.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results were considered statistically significant at P values < 0.05.
References
Huang, Y. et al. Swept-source OCT angiography of the retinal vasculature using intensity differentiation-based optical microangiography algorithms. Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina 45, 382–389, https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20140909-08 (2014).
Kuehlewein, L. et al. Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography of Type 1 Neovascularization in Age-Related Macular Degeneration. American journal of ophthalmology 160, 739–748.e732, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2015.06.030 (2015).
El Ameen, A. et al. Type 2 Neovascularization Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration Imaged by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa). 35, 2212–2218, https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000000773 (2015).
Miere, A. et al. Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Early Type 3 Neovascularization. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa). 35, 2236–2241, https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000000834 (2015).
Hwang, T. S. et al. Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Features of Diabetic Retinopathy. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) 35, 2371–2376, https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000000716 (2015).
Lee, J., Moon, B. G., Cho, A. R. & Yoon, Y. H. Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography of DME and Its Association with Anti-VEGF Treatment Response. Ophthalmology 123, 2368–2375, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.07.010 (2016).
Zhang, Q. et al. Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography of Neovascular Macular Telangiectasia Type 2. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) 35, 2285–2299, https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000000840 (2015).
Mariampillai, A. et al. Speckle variance detection of microvasculature using swept-source optical coherence tomography. Optics letters 33, 1530–1532 (2008).
Schwartz, D. M. et al. Phase-variance optical coherence tomography: a technique for noninvasive angiography. Ophthalmology 121, 180–187, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.09.002 (2014).
Spaide, R. F., Fujimoto, J. G. & Waheed, N. K. Image Artifacts In Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) 35, 2163–2180, https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000000765 (2015).
Chen, F. K., Viljoen, R. D. & Bukowska, D. M. Classification of image artefacts in optical coherence tomography angiography of the choroid in macular diseases. Clinical & experimental ophthalmology 44, 388–399, https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.12683 (2016).
Zheng, F. et al. Artifactual Flow Signals Within Drusen Detected by OCT Angiography. Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina 47, 517–522, https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20160601-02 (2016).
Ghasemi Falavarjani, K., Al-Sheikh, M., Akil, H. & Sadda, S. R. Image artefacts in swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography. The British journal of ophthalmology 101, 564–568, https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309104 (2017).
Kashani, A. H. et al. Suspended Scattering Particles in Motion: A Novel Feature of OCT Angiography in Exudative Maculopathies. Ophthalmology. Retina 2, 694–702, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2017.11.004 (2018).
Gardner, T. W., Antonetti, D. A., Barber, A. J., LaNoue, K. F. & Levison, S. W. Diabetic retinopathy: more than meets the eye. Survey of ophthalmology 47(Suppl 2), S253–262 (2002).
Aiello, L. P., Northrup, J. M., Keyt, B. A., Takagi, H. & Iwamoto, M. A. Hypoxic regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor in retinal cells. Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill.: 1960) 113, 1538–1544 (1995).
Barthelmes, D., Sutter, F. K. & Gillies, M. C. Differential optical densities of intraretinal spaces. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 49, 3529–3534, https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.07-1320 (2008).
Ishibazawa, A. et al. Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Diabetic Retinopathy: A Prospective Pilot Study. American journal of ophthalmology 160, 35–44.e31, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2015.04.021 (2015).
Tokayer, J., Jia, Y., Dhalla, A. H. & Huang, D. Blood flow velocity quantification using split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography with optical coherence tomography. Biomedical optics express 4, 1909–1924, https://doi.org/10.1364/boe.4.001909 (2013).
Zhu, J., Merkle, C. W., Bernucci, M. T., Chong, S. P. & Srinivasan, V. J. Can OCT Angiography Be Made a Quantitative Blood Measurement Tool? Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland) 7, https://doi.org/10.3390/app7070687 (2017).
Horii, T. et al. Relationship between fluorescein pooling and optical coherence tomographic reflectivity of cystoid spaces in diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology 119, 1047–1055, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.10.030 (2012).
Murakami, T. et al. Decorrelation Signal of Diabetic Hyperreflective Foci on Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. Scientific reports 8, 8798, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27192-9 (2018).
Lee, K., Chung, H., Park, Y. & Sohn, J. Efficacy of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor or steroid injection in diabetic macular edema according to fluid turbidity in optical coherence tomography. Korean journal of ophthalmology: KJO 28, 298–305, https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2014.28.4.298 (2014).
Zur, D. et al. OCT Biomarkers as Functional Outcome Predictors in Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Dexamethasone Implant. Ophthalmology 125, 267–275, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.031 (2018).
Bringmann, A., Reichenbach, A. & Wiedemann, P. Pathomechanisms of cystoid macular edema. Ophthalmic research 36, 241–249, https://doi.org/10.1159/000081203 (2004).
Stewart, M. W. et al. Corticosteroid use for diabetic macular edema: old fad or new trend? Current Diabetic Reports 12, 364–75, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-012-0281-8 (2012).
Sophie, R., Lu, N. & Campochiaro, P. A. Predictors of Functional and Anatomic Outcomes in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Ranibizumab. Ophthalmology 122, 1395–1401, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.02.036 (2015).
Ritter, M. et al. Intraretinal cysts are the most relevant prognostic biomarker in neovascular age-related macular degeneration independent of the therapeutic strategy. The British journal of ophthalmology 98, 1629–1635, https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305186 (2014).
Hirano, T., Chanwimol, K., Weichsel, J., Tepelus, T. & Sadda, S. Distinct Retinal Capillary Plexuses in Normal Eyes as Observed in Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Axial Profile. Analysis. Scientific reports 8, 9380, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27536-5 (2018).
Campbell, J. P. et al. Detailed Vascular Anatomy of the Human Retina by Projection-Resolved Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. Scientific reports 7, 42201, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42201 (2017).
Jia, Y. et al. Split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography with optical coherence tomography. Optics express 20, 4710–4725, https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.20.004710 (2012).
Neudorfer, M., Weinberg, A., Loewenstein, A. & Barak, A. Differential optical density of subretinal spaces. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 53, 3104–3110, https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-8700 (2012).
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education [grant number NRF-2016R1D1A1A02937018], and by the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the NRF, funded by the Korean government, MSIP [Grant Number NRF-2017M3A9E2056458].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.W.K. developed study. J.A. and S.W.K. designed study. S.H. and J.O. collected, analyzed, and intrepretated the data. S.M.A. prepared Fig. 2. J.A. and S.W.K. prepared, reviewed, and approved the manuscript. S.W.K. contributed the manuscript as a corresponding author. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ahn, J., Han, S., Ahn, S.M. et al. Clinical Implications of Suspended Scattering Particles in Motion Observed by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. Sci Rep 10, 15 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55606-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55606-9
This article is cited by
-
The longitudinal follow-up of a newly proposed OCTA imaging finding (SSPiM) and the importance of it as a new biomarker for treatment response in diabetic macular edema
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (2024)
-
Triple-image bit-level encryption algorithm based on double cross 2D hyperchaotic map
Nonlinear Dynamics (2023)
-
Differences in cysts characteristics and related influence on the anatomical response after dexamethasone implant in diabetic macular oedema
Eye (2022)
-
Hyperreflective foci in predicting the treatment outcomes of diabetic macular oedema after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Suspended scattering particles in motion using OCT angiography in branch retinal vein occlusion disease cases with cystoid macular edema
Scientific Reports (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.